US President Donald Trump has again warned BRICS countries. He said that the countries agreed with policies against the US have vowed to put 10 percent tariff on countries and have already been strictly hit. Trump said without taking the countries involved in the BRICS group that when I heard its name, I have attacked it strongly and if it ever becomes strong, then it will soon end.
During a press bearing in Washington, Trump said that BRICS group countries were targeted, which has now been included by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa to Iran and Indonesia.
No one is allowed to play with us
Trump said, ‘We will never allow anyone to play with us.’ He said that he is committed to protect the role of US dollar as the world’s reserved currency and will prevent any attempt to start a central bank digital currency in the US.
Refusal to be anti -America
At the same time, the BRICS group has denied being anti-America and established itself as a platform of multilateral diplomacy. Especially at a time when global platforms like G7 and G20 are struggling with internal differences and Trump’s ‘America First’ agenda. Although Brazil had put the BRICS ‘efforts in a cold settlement earlier this year, the group is carrying forward an initiative to pay crosses crossing the border using local currency.
Why are Trump Bricks threatening countries?
Trump believes that the BRICS group is the enemy of America. He has accused BRICs of conspiring to weaken the dollar. However, he has not presented any evidence. Trump fears that if the BRICS member country uses local currency for business, then the US dominated image may be tarnished and the dollar may be weak. In such a situation, Trump is repeatedly threatening to put tariffs on these countries.
At the same time, at the recent BRICS summit in Brazil, leaders criticized the American military and trade policy, which increased the tension between the US and the BRICS countries. Trump’s aggressive stance suggests that he not only sees Bricks as an economic alliance, but also as a geopolitical challenge for American dominance.
—- End —-