Supreme Court of Court Gate But on the process of carrying inhuman manner Self, Have taken cognizance. The court has taken cognizance of the pictures in which the Supreme Court Gate F But the scavenging on the head and People can be seen doing cleaning work in an inhuman manner.
Justice Sudhanshu Dust And Justice Arvind Kumar’s bench Done 6 august The East Delhi Municipal Corporation has been asked to file a reply in this matter. Justice Dust On 9 August Retirement Are done Superior The court was hearing the applications filed in a PIL, in which the issue of scavenging on the head has been raised. The court made the East Delhi Municipal Corporation a party in the case.
Court Done Said in his order, ,We are also forced to say that the pictures we have shown showed that this Court Of Gate F But also the scavenging on the head and cleaning in an inhuman manner is being done IsPublic Works Department (Pwd)) The concerned officers of the concerned applications should be filed,,
Supreme Court He instructed the corporation to file an answer on applications and explain why the work of scavenging on the head is still being done in such a way that such workers are putting their lives at risk and that too without proper equipment, as shown in photographs attached to the petition.
bench Say, ,It is clarified that If If you do not get a satisfactory answer on the next date, then we have against such officers FIR There will be no alternative to the instructions that are putting the lives of workers at risk, Court The next date of hearing in the case was fixed September 10.
In the year 2023, the Supreme Court had issued several guidelines regarding the scavenging process being done in a dangerous and inhuman manner. Justice Sudhanshu Dust And Justice To comply with the bench instructions of Arvind Kumar Monitoring Still working. The court also in January this year about the scavenging Metropolitan Special guidelines were issued for cities and Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bengaluru And it was completely banned in Hyderabad. During this time, the court also expressed displeasure over the attitude of the officials and repeatedly said that he has adopted an indifferent attitude.