There is increasing resentment among Indian applicants over US tourist visa rejections. In many cases it was observed that the applicants failed to get a visa despite being economically and professionally fully qualified. The matter came into the discussion when Instagram Vlogger Jai shared a video. In this, a person told that his friend’s visa application was rejected just because he admitted that he never went out of Delhi. The visa officer told him to roam your country first, then try to come to America.
Debate erupted on social media
This incident has launched a new debate on social media whether the history of the journey affects visa decisions. In the video, the man also shared that he himself has visited 29 states of India. This indicates that the journey inside the country can also be seen informally in the visa interview.
People divided into two groups
People’s opinion appeared to be divided on this issue. Some supported the thinking of the visa officer. One user wrote that if you have not seen the famous places of your country, then how can you roam in other countries? At the same time, another user jokingly said that think if every Indian is made necessary to roam the whole of India before going abroad… then what will happen.
However, not everyone agreed with this idea. Another user wrote that I believe that immigration should be limited to those who have the necessary skills. But (first look at your country, then I do not agree with the thinking of mine). This is a mentality to prevent progress and also looks a bit strange.
See post
Question on transparency
This entire controversy has questioned the transparency of the US visa process. People believe that if there are clear guidelines, applicants can be saved from confusion. At the same time, many people are also asking whether such policies are inadvertently creating obstacles for qualified applicants.
Wave of increasing dissatisfaction
This incident has come to light at a time when many popular cases about visa rejections are already in the headlines. It also includes people whose economic condition is very strong or whose professional career is fantastic. Despite all this, he did not get a visa, which has increased the displeasure of the people.
—- End —-