Before the budget session in Parliament on Friday, after the address of President Draupadi Murmu, Sonia Gandhi has made such statements, which are being said that it is being said that it is nothing but the feudal mindset. Sonia Gandhi used the word Poor Lady for the President and said that the President’s address was very boring (boring). Finally, she was very tired, the poor thing was barely able to say something. After this statement of Sonia, there was an uproar on social media. Very sharp reactions were given about Sonia Gandhi. The President also termed Sonia’s comment as undesirable and unacceptable. Apart from this, while addressing a rally in Dwarka (Delhi), Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that a member of a royal family of the country calls the daughter of the tribal community boring, calls it poor, calls him one thing. They do not like any person growing from backward sections. They humiliate him at step step.
Political splash between the power side and the opposition has its place, but Sonia Gandhi has invited the controversy by not taking care of the words by commenting on President Draupadi Murmu. This case also becomes serious because he is not only a senior but a serious politician. Those who have a long experience of living among parliamentary traditions. In such a situation, instead of commenting on the President’s address, he has shown immatureness by commenting directly on the President. Come, do a little analysis of their comments and its ways:
1-Poor Lady’s address to the President is not in accordance with parliamentary dignity
Sonia Gandhi is one of the senior -most leaders in the country who is credited with running the country in difficult times as the chairperson of UPA 1 and UPA 2 government. For such an experienced leader, using such a word for the President does not suit. It is not that he is not aware of the dignity of the President. The only thing is that the people of the Congress, especially the Gandhi family, still understand that they are the most important for the country.
2-The account of the work of the government is an account of the President’s address, calling it a boring is to forget the tradition
Was there any innovation in the President’s address during the ten -year tenure of the UPA? If someone finds the President’s address boring, then he has been boring from the past. He was the same during the tenure of Congress governments. Because the work of the government’s functioning is an account in the address, it is obvious that the opposition lodges its protest on it. But, it is as if it is to be called boring, it is as if it should be entertaining. The country has seen a total of 14 presidents so far and all have followed the tradition of reading the written address of the government. Yes, everyone’s speech is different. President Murmu comes from the tribal region of Odisha. Despite being his mother tongue, he has given a speech in Hindi. In such a situation, Sonia Gandhi may have been boring, but the speech of President Murm is exemplary in many ways. The country has also seen the era of former PM Manmohan Singh. Manmohan Singh’s speech, whether it was in the Lok Sabha or from the ramparts of the Red Fort, was also difficult to hear. But not only the whole country but also the opposition used to listen to them carefully. No opposition leader made such comments about his style and his speech.
3-Sonia Gandhi is a senior leader, if senior talks, small leaders will talk like ‘poor’ and ‘love letter’
When a big leader speaks something, then his supporters compete to prove their leader right. Something similar happened with Pappu Yadav. After Sonia Gandhi’s comment, where was Congress leader and independent MP Pappu Yadav staying behind, he made indecent remarks on President Draupadi Murmu’s speech. Pappu Yadav said that ‘ Poor President is like a stamp. They only have to read love letter. Pappu says that his job is only to praise. They raise the question that why BJP does not talk about economy, demotage, black money, 15 lakh rupees, 2 crore jobs, Ayushman, Jan Dhan Yojana, MSP, Manipur, Agniveer, reservation, caste census. The question arises whether Pappu Yadav does not know that the President speaks what he is given to read. Tomorrow, if the Congress government comes in place of the Modi government and the President Murmu remains, then he will have to read the praise of the Congress government. Did Murmu’s earlier presidents prepare the address with his mind?
4-Pappu Yadav must read Pratibha Patil, Giani Zail Singh etc. about the Presidents of India once.
Pappu Yadav should study a little about his former nationals before insulting the country of the country. Except for some presidents, the first President Rajendra Prasad in the country, Rajendra Prasad, etc., then most of the presidents have been taken to this highest position during the Congress, which do not have any threat to the government. Along with this, there has been a tradition of choosing such a person in the country who works like a rubber stamp. Actually, Rajendra Prasad, the country’s first nation, did not act like a rubber stamp. Due to his discretion, the country’s first PM Jawaharlal Nehru had to face a lot of trouble. He tried to stop several Bills near the Nehru cabinet and Parliament. Since then, the Congress made such a tradition, someone from the PM’s pocket would become President.