‘Whose faith is, he will go to Aurangzeb’s grave’, said RSS leader Bhaiyaji Joshi

‘Whose faith is, he will go to Aurangzeb’s grave’, said RSS leader Bhaiyaji Joshi

Senior leader of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Suresh & lsquo; Bhaiyaji & rsquo; amid the demand of some right -wing organizations to remove the grave of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb; Joshi said on Monday (March 31, 2025) that the subject has been raised unnecessarily. & Nbsp; The RSS leader said in response to a question to reporters on the sidelines of a program in Nagpur that whatever is there, he will go to his grave located in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar in Maharashtra.

It is worth mentioning that Maharashtra Navnirman Sena Chief (MNS) Raj Thackeray on Sunday condemned efforts to incite communal tension about Aurangzeb’s grave and said that history should not be seen from the glasses of caste and religion. & Nbsp; He asked people not to rely on WhatsApp forward for historical information. Thackeray also said that Mughal ruler & lsquo; killing an idea called Shivaji & rsquo; Wanted, but failed and he died in Maharashtra.

‘Without Shivaji Maharaj’s permission could not have been done’- said Raj Thackeray

MNS chief had said that Afzal Khan, the commander of Bijapur, was buried near Pratapgarh Fort and it could not be done without the permission of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. Was.

‘The theme of the grave is unnecessarily raised’- Bish Bhaiyaji Joshi

When asked about Raj Thackeray’s comments and the issue of the Mughal emperor’s grave, Joshi said, & lsquo; & lsquo; Aurangzeb’s tomb is unnecessarily raised. He died here (in India), so a tomb has been built on his grave here. Those who have faith will go there. & Rsquo; & rsquo; & nbsp;

Joshi said, & lsquo; & lsquo; We have the ideal of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, he built the tomb of Afzal Khan. It is a symbol of India’s generosity and inclusion. The tomb will remain and whoever wants to go there will go. & Rsquo; & rsquo; & nbsp; Earlier this month, RSS chief spokesperson Sunil Ambekar gave the 17th century Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb to & lsquo; irrelevant & rsquo; Was termed.

Source link