Hindu organizations are going to protest today to demand the removal of the grave of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar in Maharashtra. Regarding this matter, he has warned the Fadnavis government that it should be removed soon, otherwise the car servants will be removed like Ayodhya. The VHP and Bajrang Dal are going to start the campaign today to remove the tomb. VHP and Bajrang Dal workers will perform at the office of Tehsildars and District Magistrates across Maharashtra.
Nitin Mahajan, leader of Sambhaji Nagar of Bajrang Dal, said that Aurangzeb killed millions. Thousands of temples were broken. The temples of Kashi Mathura and millions of cows were killed. The task of glorifying the brutal ruler will not be tolerated. In such a situation, Aurangzeb’s grave should be removed. He has warned that if the tomb is not removed, they will remove it on the lines of Babri.
Also read: Controversy over Aurangzeb’s tomb, Hinduist leader Milind Ekbote banned entry into Sambhajinagar
The grave increased security
Amidst such resentment of VHP, security has been increased on Aurangzeb’s grave in Khuldabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar. Police arrangements have been increased there. Those coming are being monitored. The surveillance has been increased in view of the protests of Hindu organizations. At the same time, the opposition parties are questioning the intention of the Fadnavis government regarding the whole matter. At the same time, they are accusing them of polarizing and dividing the society.
The ruckus started with Abu Azmi’s statement
The ruckus that started with the statement of Samajwadi Party leader Abu Azmi does not seem to stop. Its political call has now reached many states. Abu Azmi was also suspended from the House for this statement.
Sapriya Sule said this
NCP MP, Supriya Sule said about this whole matter that this issue is not related to any party but history. I do not think any leader should intervene in this matter. Historians can talk on this issue. I will urge the Government of Maharashtra and do something on this only by taking opinion from historians.