On Tuesday (March 11, 2025), the Jammu and Kashmir government was threatened with the Supreme Court’s contempt case, on Tuesday (March 11, 2025) announced the formation of a committee for regularization of daily wage enjoyments in Jammu and Kashmir. Omar Abdullah said, ‘The committee will prepare a roadmap within six months and it will be included in the next budget. & Nbsp;
Responding to the budget discussions, Omar Abdullah said, ‘I will issue orders for the formation of a committee, including the Chief Secretary, Additional Chief Secretary, Secretary Plan and Law Secretary’. & Nbsp;
criticism of lathicharge on daily wage pilgrims In response, the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir described the issue of daily salaried employees as an ‘human’ issue and said that his government does not control the police. & Nbsp;
Omar Abdullah said, ‘They are our own employees and their issues are real. This is not a financial issue but a human issue. The opposition should address the issue where the police was actually being controlled ‘.
Omar Abdullah targeted LG
LG, while targeting LG, Omar Abdullah said, ‘Instead of lathi -charge on the protesters, they should have been sympathetic with them and they said that the police did not work on their government’s instructions and hoped that their talk will be heard instead of beating such protesters in future. Style ="Text-Align: justify;"> The Supreme Court on Monday strongly criticized the Jammu and Kashmir administration for failing to implement the 2007 High Court order. The apex court had commented that the case is a ‘textbook example’ of government officials working above the law. & Nbsp;
Employees again knocked on SC’s door
The Jammu and Kashmir government recently said that it would not regularize the services of daily salary and need based employees as most of them have been appointed from any government ministry without any formal order. After the order, the employees again approached the Supreme Court, where in 2006 the case was set in favor of the petitioner employees.
A bench of Justices Suryakant and N. Kotishwar Singh expressed surprise at the inaction of government officials "Prima facie contempt" Said. Rejecting the appeal, the Supreme Court said, ‘Employees have been harassed by repeatedly unclear orders, who ignore the spirit of 2007. & Nbsp;
The Supreme Court also considered imposing punishment against responsible officials and recommending disciplinary action but refrained from doing so because contempt proceedings in the High Court were already pending.
Read also: