Diljit Dosanjh’s upcoming film Sardar Ji 3 has fallen for the Indo-Pakistan war. And they themselves are accepting this thing. People are angry at the fact that why is Pakistani actress Hania Aamir place in the film? Arrows of arguments are being fired between Diljit and his opponents. There is a demand to ban Diljit’s safety, banning his films, his citizenship to be taken away.
What is Diljit Dosanjh and his film Sardar Ji3 full controversy …
Sardar G3 is the third part of a Punjabi film franchise, in which Diljit Dosanjh plays a ghost hunter. But, the discussion and dispute on this film is due to its Pakistani artist Hania Aamir. Actually, the trailer and release day of this film has come at a time when the country is angry at the terrorist attack in Pahalgam in Kashmir in April 2025. In which 26 tourists lost their lives. The responsibility of this attack was taken by an organization associated with Pakistani terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba, in such a situation, the large section of India feels that Diljit is feeling how can Diljit give a place to the Pakistan actress in his film? And how can you think of releasing it in India? There has been anger about coordination with Pakistani artists in India. But after the release of the trailer of Sardar G3, Hania Aamir’s presence has given more air to this anger. On which it has been decided not to release the film in India.
The Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) and All India Cine Workers Association (AICWA) threatened to ban Diljit and the film’s makers from working in India. Apart from this, some celebrities such as Micah Singh and Guru Randhawa also indirectly targeted Diljit, questioning them as “fake singers”, questioning them “loyalty to the country”. But is this criticism really justified?
1. The film was produced before the attack
Diljit and the makers of the film have clarified that the shooting of Sardar G3 was completed in February 2025, when India-Pakistan relations were normal. Tension increased after the Pahalgam attack, which is a matter after the production of the film. Diljit said in an interview to the BBC Asian Network, “When this film was made, the situation was completely fine. What happened after this is not in our hands.” This fact is important because it shows that the decision to cast Hania Aamir was not taken in any way with the intention of ignoring the current tension or hurting national sentiments.
The producers also said in a statement, “The shooting of the film was completed before the Pahalgam attack, and no Pakistani artist was included after the attack.” This makes it clear that the decision of casting was taken when there was no dispute. In such a situation, it is unfair to hold Diljit responsible for the current situation.
2. Decision not to release in India
After the controversy, Diljit and the makers decided that the Sardar G3 would not be released in India, but will only be released in foreign markets. This decision was taken to respect national sentiments and to avoid controversy. Diljit said in the BBC Interview, “The producers decided that the film will not be released in India, and I support his decision.” This step shows that Diljit took a responsible stand, understanding sensitivity.
Despite this, organizations such as FWICE and Aicwa threatened to ban Diljit on working in India, which is extremely rigid and unfair. The decision has already been taken not to release the film in India, yet targeting Diljit seems to be only an attempt to tarnish his image.
3. Need to keep art and politics separated
Diljit has always tried to keep his art separate from politics. He is an artist whose primary purpose is to entertain and promote their culture. Even if he does not accept this argument, his decision to work with Hania Aamir was a professional and artistic decision, not any political statement. Punjabi singer Jasbir Jassi also supported Diljit in this matter, saying, “Dual standards are being adopted in our industry. The songs of foreign singers are included in Indian films, but it is wrong to target a Pakistani artist.”
This argument of Jassi is accurate. The Indian film industry often has a synergy with foreign artists and singers, but only targeting Pakistani artists shows a biased attitude. If there is a question of national sentiments, should all such coordination be banned? This will be an impractical and exit cream approach.
4. Diljit’s contribution to national pride
Diljit has repeatedly increased the pride of his Punjabi culture and Indianness. In the 2025 Met Gala, he wore a cap with a map of Punjab and Gurmukhi script, which was a symbol of showing India’s Punjabi culture proudly on the world stage. He said, “It was not important for me to go to Met Gala, but the greatest represented of Punjab and Turban was the greatest.”
In addition, Diljit created history by performing a Punjabi artist for the first time in 2023 at the Kachela Music Festivejal. His films such as Jatt and Juliet and Honsala Rakh got Punjabi cinema recognized globally. In such a situation, it is not only unfair to question his patriotism, but also to ignore his contribution.
5. Impact of social media and trolling
Social media has played a negative role in this controversy. Some people questioned Diljit’s citizenship, without any concrete evidence. Artists like Guru Randhawa also indirectly targeted him, which is unnecessary and personal attack. Diljit has always responded to his simplicity and positivity. He said, “If someone hates me, then perhaps there is some shortage in me. I only pay attention to my work.”
Trolling and negativity on social media have further promoted this controversy, but Diljit handled it with dignity. His response reflects his mature and responsible personality.
while going…
It is not only wrong to link art with politics and target an artist for his professional decisions, but also an attack on creative Freedom. Diljit has repeatedly proved that he is devoted to his culture and country. We should appreciate his contribution, not to drag them into unnecessary controversies. We have many mediums to respond to Pakistan’s anti-India acts. For this, no Indian should be blamed.