A case in Etawah district of Uttar Pradesh is in discussion nowadays. It is reported that a narrator has been assaulted here. The narrator alleges that he had come to tell Bhagwat Katha, but some people opposed it, asked caste and assaulted it on being a Yadav. A video of the incident is also viral, in which the nose is being rubbed by touching the woman’s leg by turning the head of the narrator. Samajwadi Party President Akhilesh Yadav has strongly objected to this incident.
Although the allegations made in this incident, the reason behind the incident, etc. are the subject of investigation, but there are many examples in the Puranas, which mention such storytellers who are not Brahmins. He is not originally Vedapathi, but he had such knowledge of the Purana stories including the Vedas that even the big Brahmins considered him his good fortune in listening to the Purana stories from him.
Sutji mentions Sutji in Satyanarayana Katha
If you have ever heard the story of Satyanarayana, then you must have noticed that Panditji who came to worship often says ‘Sut Uwach’, that is, Sut ji said- Saying this, he starts narrating the story. Actually, all the people you are listening to the story of Satyanarayana today, ‘Sut ji’ had heard. In this Satyanarayana story, it is also known that this story is recorded in the Reva section of Skanda Purana.
Sut ji had narrated not only Satyanarayana Katha, but also narrated the entire Skandpuran, and why only Skanda Purana has told the story of 10 Puranas in 18 Mahapurans. Therefore, if you see in many Puranas, then you will get the beginning from here. Suta Uwach … In fact, cotton is a caste, which is in the Varna hybrid caste under the ancient caste system. Varna hybrid caste means a child born by the union of two castes.
Lamharashan ji is called Sut Ji
Actually, Sut ji’s real name was Lomharshan ji. He was a child of Kshatriya-Brahmin parents. Therefore, there were no complete Brahmins. One opinion about his birth is also prevalent that he was born from Jyoti that he was born. Once during the yajna, Havi, who dedicated Jupiter to Indra, was also found and in this way the light that was generated by the coincidence of two mantras was called Lomharshan ji. He was born with a combination of Indra (Kshatriya) and Jupiter (Brahmin) qualities, so he was called yarn.
Vyasa Rishi accepted Lomharshan ji as a disciple and made them full of complete knowledge of the Puranas written. In fact, when Maharishi Ved Vyas composed Mahapuranas, he was upset that he had many disciples, but no one was completely remembered by all 18 Puranas. In the midst of this concern, Sut ji i.e. Lomharashan ji reached him to take learning. Today it is believed that the person of the cotton clan did not have the right to Vedabhyas, it is absolutely wrong, because Maharishi Ved Vyas not only made Lomharashan ji his disciple, but also gave him knowledge of the Puranas along with the Vedas.
The story of 12 years of Kathasatra was organized
The style of telling the story of Lomharashan ji was so interesting that the listeners’ Rome was happy, so his name became romantic with Lomharshan. Due to being born in the cotton clan, he is also called Sautibhushan, hence in the Purana stories, he has been addressed by the name Sutji everywhere. This address is like an open declaration of the Purana Katha, Bhagwat Katha, Ram Katha, there is no caste bond at all. Devarshi Narada himself also sees Sut ji sitting on Vyas back and bows down and listens to Bhagwat Katha from him. Romharshan ji was also conferred with the title of sage due to reading the story for 12 consecutive years.
Ugrashrava ji was the son of these cords. Ugrashrava ji was also a narrator and like his father, all 18 Puranas were knowledgeable. His guru was also Maharishi Ved Vyas. The story of Mahabharata was narrated by Ugrashrava ji, which we still read as a book. This is his hearing story which is in front of us today.
The story of the birth of Maharishi Ved Vyas is also strange
Talking about Maharishi Ved Vyas himself, he was born in the same way in Varna hybrid caste. Vasistha became the son of Rishi, Shakti and Shakti’s son Parashar. The time of sage Parashar was of Dwapar Yuga. On the other hand, there was a king in this era. The king was so powerful that Indra also became his friend. The king had done penance by taking Brahmacharya fast for many years, but Indra explained to him before his penance was completed and said and said, leave the path of penance and become the lord of this whole land. The king obeyed him and started returning to his kingdom. On the way, when he stopped for rest at one place, he became comfortable to see the beautiful coast of Yamuna and the beautiful flower forest. During this time, he got ejaculated. When the semen fell into the water of Yamuna, it was swallowed by a fish.
The fish was actually a nymph, named Adrika. When the fish was caught by the fishermen and bitten, a girl was born from her womb. Due to the smell of fish, he was named Matsyagandha. One day sage Parashar saw him. He was sitting on the river sitting on the boat of Matsyagandha. Parashar Muni became enamored with his beauty and said, “Devi! I want to produce a son from you.” Satyavati said, “Munivar! You are a Brahmagyan and I Nishad Girl. Our relationship is not possible.
Knowing your truth, you will not feel any stigma in the world. In this way Matsyagandha was called Satyavati and Krishna became the mother of Krishna Dvaipayan, son of Rishi. This Krishna dwapayan later became Ved Vyas, who composed many Puranas, including Mahabharata. Compiring commentary and commentary texts and also divided the Vedas separately. The throne, which narrates the story, is also called Vyas Peeth or Vyas Gaddi in his honor.
It is clear from the story of Romharashan Sut ji, Ugrashrava Rishi and Maharishi Vyas himself that there is no obstacle like caste bond in telling and narrating the story. The story of Maharishi Valmiki also comes to many places, where he is told Ratnakar and there are many differences regarding his birth from birth.
The story of knowledgeable tender is recorded in Mahabharata
A story comes in the Mahabharata itself. That is, of a hunter. The disease was so knowledgeable that he had preached karma to a Brahmin. Sri Krishna gave the same such as the preaching of karma to Arjuna in the battlefield. This knowledge of the karma given by the disease Vishwad Gita Known by the name of Krishna also tells Arjuna in further detail. It is the most important part of the Mahabharata and is a symbol of knowledge, the forest is included in the festival. It means to say that being knowledgeable in the Sanatan tradition, telling the story, caste does not come anywhere to perform Bhagwat bhajan and there is no one in Indian written history.
Who is unaware of the story of Shabari? She was a woman of Vanvasi Adiwali Bhilani caste, but the great sage was a disciple of Matang Muni. The sage gave him an essence of ‘Shri Ram’, an essence of knowledge of all the Vedas. Shabri used to chant only the name and satsang the hymns of Shri Ram. He never had to face opposition from anyone and Shri Ram himself came to his hut one day.
Prahlada, son of the demon Hiranyakashyapa, is also called the devotee Shiromani, even after being born in the demon clan, Prahlad was a devotee heart and God satsang was his quality. He had karma. On this matter, he was opposed to his father and when this protest went ahead and dead, God himself came to protect him.
Then Etawah itself comes in the Braj region. The same Brajbhoomi where all the hair of Shri Krishna was Sakha, Yadav Gop. He played with him, composed many pastimes, he has been involved in his story himself, so even if the Etawah incident is true then it is just shameful. This is also an insult to Sanatan.