There was a debate between the Bouncer of Ambience Mall and the people of the society in the society of Gurugram.
Entry of 5 people, including 4 women, has been banned in the famous Ambience Mall of Gurugram. Even the notice of his name was affixed to the mall gate. The case is related to the mall management and the Lagoon Society adjacent to it.
,
In this list, the first society’s resident Welfare Association (RWA) was also the wife of the president, which was later removed. Actually, these people said that the mall management wrongly diverted traffic. Due to which the gate of the society is being jammed.
Angry society people stopped Uteron on Sunday. After this, the bouncers of the mall came there. He lifted the chain to stop Uteron. Its 59 second video has also surfaced. In which the bouncer is telling the woman of the society not to force me to misbehave. People also accused the mall’s lady bouncers of scuffle.
At the same time, the mall management argued that the road is used for all. No one has the right to block it. The maintenance of the road is mall. It does not have the right of any person or society.
Photos of the dispute of the people of the society-bouncers
Lady bouncers carrying the chain to stop the uteron of the people of the society and the woman protesting behind it.
Lady bouncer alleged that only the people of the society were misbehaving with her.
During the debate, the woman of the society tried to snatch the chain, on which the bouncer warned not to misbehave.
See copy of notice on the mall gate …
Notice of ban on the entry of the people of Lagoon Society by the mall management.
What did the people of the society say after the action of the mall …
- Traffic diverted without notice: Kavita Roy, who lives in the Lagoon Society, said that the route leading to Ambience Mall was turned right in front of the society gate without any notice. Due to which the problem of jam increased. This made it difficult for him to come and go. The line of vehicles reaches the main gate of the society. Troubled by this, the people of the society stopped the Uteron on Sunday. Then the lady bouncers of the mall came there and scrambled with them.
- Hurt the dignity of women: Sanjay Lal, president of the Federation of Apartment Owners Association, described it against the dignity and self -esteem of women and demanded intervention from the Women’s Commission. He has demanded immediate removal of public notices, apologizing and changing the road to ensure safety of the residents of the society.
- Builder and RWA did not hear: The people of the society say that according to the Deed of Declaration filed in the court, this road is only the property of the Lagoon Group Housing Society. The problem started three-four months ago, but the management has not given any reason to divert the way. Complained to the builder and RWA, but no hearing was held.
- Illegal to stop going to public place: Former RWA president of the society Sanjay Lal Mathur said that initially the notice also included the name of the current RWA president’s wife, which was later removed. The names of four other women are still in notice. Some were not even involved in the performance. They will file a complaint against this in the Women’s Cell. It is illegal to prevent anyone from going to public place. Most of the residents in the society are senior citizens and have trouble in movement. This is why it was forced to protest.
Line of vehicles due to traffic divert.
What did the goods management say on the allegation of the people of the society…
- Mall management said- no right to stop the way: The media in -charge of the Ambience Mall said that the road can be used by a person, but no one person or institution has the right to stop it. The road is also used by mall customers, hotel customers, other societies. Blocking the road causes disturbance and it is illegal to do so. The incident has no relation with the mall.
- Bouncers did nothing: The mall management said that no bouncer or security personnel had any contribution to this. As soon as the team came to know about the situation, the police were immediately informed. The road keeps the road. No resident or society has special right over it. This route is open for public use. Blocking the entry of vehicles by residents of Lagoon apartments caused heavy inconvenience to both the customers and local residents of the mall. All the allegations are baseless.
Advocate Manish Shandilya said that the entry of the customer cannot be banned.
What did the legal expert say on the order of the mall …
- Mall can go to court against the ban, not private property: Gurugram Senior Advocate Manish Shandilya says that after building the mall, shops and other establishments have been given to the third party. In such a situation, the entry of a customer cannot be banned by the Ambience Mall by calling it a private property. It is a violation of the rights of customers and common citizens. All the citizens who have been banned can plead for justice in the court.
- Shopping can stop goods but should not be discriminatory or arbitrary: Advocate Manish further said- Although the second aspect is that shopping mall management has the right to prevent someone from entering, but this right should not be arbitrary or discriminatory, and should be applied with proper behavior.