New DelhiA few moments ago
- Copy link
The petitioner has said that India should be changed to Republic of India.
On February 17, a petition was heard in the Delhi High Court to change the English name of India from India or Hindustan.
Justice Sachin Dutta extended the time to file a reply to the central government on the petition. In the hearing held on 4 February, the Center had demanded to extend the time to file a reply.
In fact, a person named Namah, who hails from Delhi (Ghaziabad), has demanded amendment in Article 1 of the Constitution. He says that India (English), which is India, should change it to the Union of India or India.
Namah also filed a petition in the High Court demanding the government to direct a decision on its representation. In 2020, the Supreme Court directed that this petition should be considered as a representation and should be presented to the concerned Ministry.
The petitioner has said …
India’s name should be one. It has many names right now. Such as Republic of India, India, India, Republic of India, etc. There should not be so many names. There are different names on separate paper. The ‘Government of India’ is written on the Aadhaar card. ‘Union of India’ on driving license, ‘Republic of India’ is written on passport. This causes confusion.
In 1948, the name of India was also opposed in the Constituent Assembly. The petitioner says that the British used to call slaves as Indians. He named India in English. On 15 November 1948, while arguing the draft of Article-1 of the Constitution, M. Anantashyanam Ayyangar and Seth Govind Das strongly opposed the name of the country to name India in English. He suggested the names of India, India and Hindustan in English instead of India. But at that time it was not taken care of. Now the court should direct the Central Government to rectify this mistake.
,
Read these reports related to the court …
Hearing on the place of worship in the Supreme Court postponed: 3 judges were to be held in the bench, CJI said- 2 judges present today, will see later
On February 17, the Supreme Court postponed the hearing on 7 petitions related to the place of worship law. Actually, the case was to be heard in the bench of 2 judges. CJI Sanjeev Khanna said that today only a bench of 2 judges is sitting. Will see this matter some other day. CJI said on the intervention applications filed on the matter that today we will not accept any such petition. They also have a limit. Read full news …
Porn comment- YouTuber Alahabadia reprimanded the Supreme Court: said- Dirt in his mind; Told the center- take action
The Supreme Court on 17 February heard the appeal of Ranveer Alahabadia in the pornographic comment case. The court gave relief to Alahabadia from arrest, but also reprimanded him. The court said that the language of your comment is distorted and the mind is dirty. Not only the parents, daughters and sisters were also embarrassed. Read full news …