Sri of Vrindavan Banke Disputes about the management of Bihari temple While hearing, the Supreme Court mentioned Lord Krishna and advised to resolve the case through mediation. On Monday (August 4, 2025), the Supreme Court said that Lord Krishna first Mediator Were and similarly this issue too Mediation Should be resolved through
In the petition that the Supreme Court was hearing, the ordinance of the Uttar Pradesh government has been challenged under which there is a plan to hand over the temple to a trust. NDTV According to the report of the court said, ,Lord Krishna first Mediator Were… Please You too Mediation Solve this issue from, The court made this comment and the UP government and Banke Bihari Trust has been advised to constitute a committee.
Hearing of petitions related to temple Justice Suryakant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi The bench did Petitioners on behalf of Senior Advocate Shyam Dewan argued that Shri Banke The Bihari Temple is a private religious institution and the government wants to gain indirect control over the property and management of the temple through this ordinance. He alleged that the government of the temple Fund Want to buy land and use it in construction works, which is unfair.
Shyam Dewan told the court that the government is occupying our money. This temple is a private temple and we are challenging unilateral order on the government’s plan. He also alleged that in some civil cases, the temple Party No, the government has obtained orders behind the back,
Court Petitioner Asked how you can call a religious place completely private, They Also when millions of devotees come there? Management can be private, but no god can be private, Justice Suryakant also said that the income of the temple should be not only for management, but also for the development of temple and devotees.
From the UP government Senior Advocate Naveen Pahwash Plated. He told the court that the government from Yamuna coast to temple Corridor Want to make the devotees to get facilities and the temple area can be preserved better. He clarified that the temple Fund It will be used only in the activities related to the temple. The court commented on this and said that why should the money of the temple go to your pocket? Why can’t the government use it for temple development?
The Supreme Court, indicating to solve the case with a balance, suggested that it High Court A retired judge or senior district judge of a neutral committee can be appointed as the temple Fund And will monitor the expenditure. The court asked the Goswami community whether they can spend some part of the amount of offerings and donations in the temple on the facilities and public development of the devotees. On this, Shyam Dewan agreed that we have no objection to it. On this, the Supreme Court said that we are a neutral Umpire Who will keep Fund Management Will monitor it.
Shyam Dewan also told that the temple is being managed by more than two hundred and fifty Goswami and they want to maintain the current system. They High Court An objection to an old order of giving a decision on the personal dispute of the two parties Banke The order related to the Bihari temple was passed.