Former Chief Justice (CJI) DY Chandrachud of the country has once again made milk and water water of milk and water water. In India Today Conclave, he told how difficult it is for the judges to take a decision. Whereas for some people on social media, the meaning of freedom of Jyudichari is considered only to give a verdict against the government. If the decision is taken in favor of the government, then it is said that the judge is not independent. DY Chandrachud had also raised questions about the settling set by the special class of the society even before this.
The former CJI has once again expressed the pain of the judges that they are made to stand in the dock, but they have no way to put the truth in front. The former CJI told how he got fame as a judge who did not give bail, while Congress leader Pawan Kheda never gets bail immediately. Similarly, what is the reason behind repeated postponement of Bell petition of Omar Khalid is never discussed. Talking to India Today, he took a dig at all his critics.
Did all the bail cases send to Justice Bela?
While clarifying not being famous for not giving bail, Chandrachud said that I was accused that I used to send most of the bail petitions to Justice Bella. Those who are famous for not giving bail. Omar Khalid is not getting bail. Chandrachud said that it is very easy to make allegations of such ordinary and unless evidence. While the facts are the opposite. He said that when I was the Chief Justice of India and I said that we would give priority to bail, and we also showed this by doing this.
The former CJI said that we gave bail in 21,000 cases. And when you say that, if a particular person does not get bail, then you have to understand the reason for it. I have told that in my court everyone got bail from A to Z. Every person who should have got bail, got bail.
As far as Justice Bella is concerned, the bail cases look at every bench of the Supreme Court because the highest number of cases in the Supreme Court are criminal. So every judge of the Supreme Court sees criminal cases, which are allocated from the computer in a random manner. Therefore, the allegations made about Justice Bella are factually wrong.
How Pawan Kheda saved from arrest, how did the immediate bell get
After making derogatory comments about Prime Minister Modi, his arrest came after the case registered on the Congress spokesperson. An attempt was made to arrest while catching a flight in Assam. Justice Chandrachud says that his lawyers came to the Supreme Court and said at lunch time that my client is being arrested. Because he has some objectionable things somewhere. There is no doubt that what Pawan said was objectionable. Pawan Kheda’s lawyer Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi himself said that I do not agree with my client’s statement. But the issue was that it was not a case of arrest. Then who protected them? The Supreme Court. In such a situation, it cannot be selective that if you do not get bail in a case, you say that the Supreme Court does not provide bail.
There is a rule of bail, but its conditions are also
Former CJI says that the last thing I want to say is that the perception of considering innocent in India is stronger. That is, the person is innocent until the crime is proved. This means that bail should generally be granted, while the jail should be like exception. But a judge has to see if this person will tamper with the evidence on getting bail? Second, can he run away from justice? It means to say that the job of the judge is not easy. Because there is a balance in every case. Because, the whole society is watching some special cases. Maybe the balance is sitting right or not sitting in a case. But it is wrong to blame the entire system without evidence.
Omar Khalid’s lawyers kept on deferring debate on bail
A few days ago, Chandrachud made a huge disclosure about taking a date on the date of the lawyers of Omar Khalid and the appeal on the bail plea of ​​Omar Khalid on his appeal to stop the hearing repeatedly. The former CJI had said in this interview that I do not want to comment on the merit of the case, but I will definitely tell you one thing, which no one gets attention.
The former CJI gives surprising information in this case. Chandrachud says that if not much, at least seven times, the lawyers appearing for Omar Khalid had asked for further dates and then the bail plea was finally withdrawn.
—- End —-