Shariful Islam, accused of a fatal attack on Bollywood actor Saif Ali Khan, was given an identity parade in Arthur Road Jail on Wednesday morning. During this time, the magistrate (Tehsildar) was accompanied by Saif’s staff nurse Eliama Philip and Naini Junu. Shariful was parked with some other accused. After this, Elijama and Junu were asked to identify the attacker who attacked Saif’s house on 16 January.
Earlier, Additional Commissioner of Mumbai Police Paramjit Singh Dahiya had said that in the case of the attack on Saif Ali Khan, the police has not only arrested the right accused, but the Mumbai Police has many evidence against the accused. In fact, questions have been raised from the beginning about the arrest of the right accused in this case. Here the question is also arising that when the accused is correct, then why has face recognition done.
On this, the Additional CP said that when the police investigate any case, it is not one, and the face recognition is a link to the accused. This does not mean that the police has any doubt about the accused being correct or wrong. By the way, after this claim of Mumbai Police, now that face recognition report of the accused has also come out, which are being questioned.
If police sources are to be believed, forensic experts have made it clear in their report that the decent Islam present in the police is the man who is responsible for the attack on Saif. Earlier, the person who has been arrested was trying to say that the police arrested for the attack, they do not match the person who had arrested the first CCTV. That is, he is not the right accused. Later, the matter of finger print missamach also came to light.
On the question asked on the issue of finger print, the Additional Commissioner said that the finger print report that is being said is not available to the Mumbai Police. The investigation by the police so far in the case of the attack on Saif Ali Khan’s house is a great example of clue -based investment, an investigation which has many evidences against the accused, not one, but against the accused. . Which he will show in the court and show it.