The Supreme Court on Monday (July 28, 2025) special intense of voter list in Bihar Revision (Sir) Hearing the petitions filed against the decision of the Election Commission. Court Sir Draft of List But no restriction Has installed
The court could not hear a detailed hearing today because Justice Chief Justice Bhushan to Suryakant Ramakrishna Gawai Had to attend an administrative meeting with. Justice Suryakant and Justice Joymalya The bench was sitting to hear the case. The bench Petitioners Giving assurance of hearing, he has asked how much time it will take for the cross -examination.
Justice Suryakant said, ,You guys tell how much time it will take for cross -examination, We will not hear the interim subject, Will listen to the main topic, Its date will be given soon, Senior Advocate gopal Shankaranarayan And Kapil Sibal Draft List Has demanded a ban on. He said that this will inconvenience four and a half crore voters.
Advocate gopal Shankaranarayan Said that once a draft Publisher People who List I will not be, register them objections and List Steps have to be taken to join. He said that on June 10, an appeal was not made to stop it because the court was ready for hearing before the draft.
Shankaranarayan Said that the court gave Aadhaar, EPIC, The ration card was also said to be considered. The Commission did not follow it, on which the court told the lawyer that you may not read the Commission’s answer properly. Supreme Court has demanded a ban on draft Petitioners He said that you have said in the last hearing that you are not asking for a ban.
Election Commission lawyer Rakesh Dwivedi Said, ‘We have written that we are accepting this document, but not considering it as final. Other documents are necessary in support. He said that this is just a draft, People will be given an opportunity to improve objection.
The Supreme Court said that when we Petitioners If you agree with the whole process will be canceled. There is no need to stop right now. Justice Suryakant said that Aadhaar and EPIC But Sir Should be considered during. If there is doubt in a case, then necessary action can be taken on it. However, it cannot be called an order. This is the suggestion.
(With input from Nipun Sehgal)